Feb 22, 2012 Posted in Business by GeoUlrich

UPDATE 3-Brocade first qtr beats; says ethernet segment to grow


Tue Feb 21, 2012 7:12pm EST

* Q1 adj EPS $0.20 vs est $0.13

* Q1 rev up 3 pct at $561 mln vs est $542.4 mln

* Sees Q2 adj EPS $0.11-$0.12 vs est $0.12

* Sees Q2 rev $530-$545 mln vs est $537 mln

* Shares rise 7 pct after hours

By Siddharth Cavale and Nicola Leske

Feb 21 (Reuters) – Network gear maker Brocade
Communications Systems Inc reported
better-than-forecast quarterly results, helped by a rise in
sales of its storage equipment products, and said it expects
faster growth at the ethernet segment this year.

Shares of Brocade, which have rebounded more than 80 percent
from their August 2011 lows, jumped 7 percent to $5.85 in
after-hours trading on Tuesday.

The company expects its ethernet business to “fully outpace”
the market in terms of year-over-year growth as many enterprise
customers continue to build out their ethernet fabrics to keep
pace with the growing demands of their data center networks.

In the first quarter, sales at the ethernet business, which
contributes about 30 percent to total revenue, fell 18 percent
sequentially, hurt by softness in federal sales and lower
enterprise revenue.

“Q1 (for ethernet) was what it was and we are expecting to
get back to growth in Q2 and beyond,” the company said.

Revenue rose 3 percent to $561 million in the quarter. Sales
from the company’s storage segment grew 4 percent to $406.4
million.

“They are very dependent on the U.S. economy, which is doing
better. They have the right strategy but we’re in a risky
environment,” analyst Edward Zabitsky of ACI Research said and
added the company was also facing a lot of pressure from rivals
like Cisco Systems.

The San Jose, California-based company forecast earnings of
11 cents to 12 cents a share on revenue of $530 million to $545
million for the second quarter.

Analysts, on average, were expecting the company to earn 12
cents a share, on revenue of $537 million, according to Thomson
Reuters I/B/E/S.

For the first quarter, the company posted an adjusted profit
of 20 cents a share, 7 cents above the average analyst
expectations.

Last month, Reuters reported the company had received
first-round bids from a handful of potential buyers and hired
Frank Quattrone’s Qatalyst Partners to focus on a deal that
could result in a leveraged buyout.

Shares of Brocade, whose current sale process is the third
since 2009, closed at $5.50 on the Nasdaq.

© 2011 REUTERS (www.reuters.com)
Feb 22, 2012 Posted in Business by GeoUlrich

Sales-Tax Measures ‘to Cost Us Big’

Amazon.com wants to bring order to the way online retailers collect state and local taxes. And that has Web entrepreneur Stacy Strawn feeling anxious.

Under a 1992 Supreme Court ruling, online retailers including her aren’t required to collect sales tax for purchases made in states where they do not have a physical presence.

Pat Jarrett for The Wall Street Journal

Stacey Strawn says proposed online sales-tax rules would hurt her Silver Gallery: ‘The big retailers will eventually take over online shopping.’

Amazon is backing new sales-tax proposals but some small businesses are worried it may hurt them in the end, Stu Woo reports on digits. Photo: AP.

But Ms. Strawn, and others like her who operate with just a dozen or so employees, would have to begin collecting and remitting taxes for the more than 40 states that currently charge sales and use taxes, along with thousands of cities and counties across the country, as set forth by a Senate proposal unveiled last month.

That proposal, which has the support of Amazon, includes an exception for small-business retailers with less than $500,000 in annual “remote” sales—a sum so low that it wouldn’t even cover Ms. Strawn’s employees’ wages.

“These are the most small-business-unfriendly measures I’ve seen in years,” said Ms. Strawn, whose Waynesboro, Va., store, Silver Gallery, sells sterling-silver bowls, cups and jewelry. “This is going to cost us big.”

Ms. Strawn isn’t entirely sure what the cost to her business would be. A 2006 PriceWaterhouseCoopers study found local and state tax compliance costs small retailers 13.47% of all sales tax collected, compared to 2.17% for large retailers.

The concerns voiced by Ms. Strawn and other small online retailers highlight a new point of contention in the debate over taxing Internet sales—the so-called small-business exemption in federal proposals is now so small that even many small fry aren’t protected.

“The Internet is the only place where someone like us can be next door to an Amazon,” Ms. Strawn said. “If they don’t do something, the big retailers will eventually take over online shopping. And that would be a huge loss.”

Nearly all of the Silver Gallery’s $3 million in revenue last year came from online sales. The store currently has seven full-time employees, but she may have to cut some jobs as a way to deal with the added costs.

Legislation that would require online retailers to collect state taxes has been proposed in each of the past seven Congresses, including House and Senate bills in 2007 that set the small-business exemption at a much more generous $5 million in annual sales.

Amazon’s willingness to get behind the proposals—combined with pressure from states for new sources of tax revenue, and bipartisan efforts in the House and Senate—has given the movement more traction this year.

Pat Jarrett for The Wall Street Journal

Employee Stephanie Cooke takes orders.

Last month, the world’s largest online retailer expressed support for a Senate bill calling for standardized federal rules that would require online retailers to collect out-of-state sales taxes—with a $500,000 exemption for small retailers. Paul Misener, Amazon’s vice president of public policy, said at a House Judicial Committee hearing Wednesday that any small-business exemption must be kept low to protect states’ rights to collect taxes, while leveling the playing field between online retailers and their brick-and-mortar competitors that already collect state taxes—typically reflected as higher sticker prices. “No one should want these online sellers to take advantage of a newly created un-level playing field over small Main Street businesses, and no one should want government to pick business-model winners and losers this way,” Mr. Misener said.

“Amazon is prepared to make its technology available as a service to help sellers by collecting sales tax for them,” he added.

Other supporters of the proposals include brick-and-mortar-only retailers who believe the standardization will help create a more level playing field overall in the retail industry. Without a state sales tax, online retailers “have nearly a 10% discount automatically,” contends Maggie Jetter, owner of Tweed Baby Outfitters, a baby goods and apparel store in Nashville, Tenn., that doesn’t sell its wares online. “We’re doing the same thing, offering the same products, so the law needs to be reformed and updated,” she says.

Online retail sales in the U.S. grew 13% to $176 billion last year, and are expected to grow by 12% to $197 billion in 2011, according to Forrester Research.

The University of Tennessee estimates that states and local governments will lose up to about $12 billion in 2012 from uncollected sales taxes.

Tod Cohen, vice president, eBay Government Relations, said in testimony Wednesday that the company believes the U.S. Small Business Administration should be the one to determine which small business retailers would be exempt. Forcing small businesses to take on the same costs and tax burdens as national retail businesses is unrealistic, unfair and will “unbalance the playing field” between giant retailers and small-business retailers on the Internet, Mr. Cohen said at Wednesday’s hearing.

The SBA defines most small retailers as those making less than $7 million in annual revenue. In some categories, businesses such as women’s clothing, book and games stores are considered small businesses if they have revenue of less than $25 million, according to the agency.

Some small and midsize retailers argue they may have to raise their prices to cover the costs of complying with a slew of new state taxes, under the proposed standardized federal rules. The risk is that shoppers looking for the best prices may then move their purchasing to larger sites that can absorb the added costs, said Joe Sponholz, president of BabyAge.com, a Wilkes-Barre, Pa.-based online baby products retailer with 29 full-time employees.

“It’s not the start-ups or the Amazons of the world you have to worry about here. It’s all the guys in the middle,” said Mr. Sponholz, whose company recently built a distribution center in Nevada rather than California, to avoid paying state sales taxes. He says the $500,000 sales limit will only help very small retailers who have yet to develop a truly national reach.

A House bill introduced in October is also limited in the number of small businesses it would exempt. It makes an exception for those whose out-of-state sales are less than $100,000 in any one state, or a total of $1 million nationwide.

—Stu Woo contributed to this article.

Write to Angus Loten at angus.loten@wsj.com

© 2011 Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com)
Feb 22, 2012 Posted in Business by GeoUlrich

How to Value Stocks? Ignore Economic News

The stock market jumped 6% last week on growing hopes of an imminent economic recovery. It has risen 39% from the March lows on similar hopes. Of course, it had previously fallen nearly 60% on fears of a slump.

All these moves have one thing in common: Millions of investors have acted on the belief that share values are closely related to what will happen in the economy in the next few months and years. But are they right?

Not according to Ben Inker, director of asset allocation at contrarian fund company Grantham Mayo Van Otterloo & Co. In a recent and fascinating note (“Valuing Equities in an Economic Crisis, or How I Learned to Stop Worrying about the Economy and Love the Stock Market”), Mr. Inker persuasively argues that the next moves in the economy shouldn’t actually matter too much to investors at all.

Why? Two reasons.

First, because most of the value of shares really depends on the cash they will generate many years, even decades, ahead. The next few years are only a minuscule part of the equation. “Since stocks do not have an expiration date and dividends grow over time,” Mr. Inker argues, “the duration of stocks is extremely long. If we assume that half of the return from stocks in a given year comes from the dividends and half from the growth in dividends, most of the value of stocks comes from cash flows in the distant future.”

How distant? Using Mr. Inker’s hypothesis, it turns out that about 75% of the value of shares is actually based on dividends that will be paid more than eleven years from now. Half the value is based on dividends to be paid after 25 years, and a quarter on those to be paid after about 50 years.

In other words, when you look at the market today, three quarters of its true value is based on what companies will earn and pay out after 2020 and half is based on what they will do after 2034. So really, how much attention should you pay to next quarter’s earnings?

This is counterintuitive to most investors. Mr. Inker does not go into his math in detail, but some simple calculations may illustrate the point. Imagine, in a perfect world of smooth returns, you buy a $100 basket of shares today with a 7% earnings yield. They pay out half these annual earnings in dividends, and reinvest the rest to grow. In the first year you have a $100 investment earning $7 and paying $3.50 in dividends. In year two that’s grown to a $103.50 investment earning $7.25 and paying about $3.62 in dividends. And so it goes over time. After 10 years your investment has grown to $141 and the dividends are $4.94. By year 25 the investment is worth $236, and the dividends are $8.27. If you look out 100 years, your investment is worth a remarkable $3,119 and the dividends are $109, or more than the original purchase price.

You probably won’t hold on till then. (Your grandchildren might not, either.) But the value of that soaring income stream is built into the price we pay when we buy shares today for $100, and sell them 25 years from now for $236. Even after discounting future earnings — a dollar next year is worth slightly less than this year, and so on — these distant earnings form an incredibly large part of today’s value, simply because they are so large.

There is a second reason for not paying too much attention to the economy’s next move. No matter what happens next month or next year, sooner or later the economy will probably find its way back onto its long-term path anyway. If we now boom wildly, we’ll pay for it with weaker growth down the line. And if things are bad for a while, eventually they’ll pick up. That can be true even for devastating blows. GMO’s calculations show that by the late 1940s, Mr. Inker writes, the U.S. economy had returned to the long-term growth path “as if the Depression had never happened.” And that was even true by the late 1950s for West Germany after the devastation of the Second World War.

This sort of analysis is a useful antidote to stock market moods.

Wall Street is back on its happy pills again. At some point, maybe even soon, brokers may start urging us to pay too much for stocks on the basis of this year’s economic growth or next. Canny investors may respond: But what about 2034?

Write to Brett Arends at brett.arends@wsj.com

© 2011 Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com)
Feb 22, 2012 Posted in Business by GeoUlrich

House Republicans seek more documents in Solyndra probe


Fri Feb 17, 2012 6:24pm EST

* “Project Amp” received $1.4 bln loan guarantee

* Solyndra bid on supplying rooftop project

* GOP: deal was lifeline for struggling company

* Energy Dept says Republicans distorting facts

By Roberta Rampton

WASHINGTON, Feb 17 (Reuters) – Republican lawmakers
alleged on Friday that the Energy Department used a loan
guarantee to a massive rooftop solar project as part of a
last-ditch effort to bail out Solyndra, a solar panel maker that
later failed.

The Energy Department denied the claims. The White House has
said House Republicans are distorting the facts in the interest
of politics.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee asked Energy
Secretary Steven Chu to provide internal documents about the
relationship between Solyndra and “Project Amp,” the largest
U.S. project to install solar panels on commercial rooftops.

“We have questions about Solyndra’s involvement in Project
Amp, and what role Solyndra’s involvement played in DOE’s
decision” to give the rooftop project a loan guarantee, U.S.
Republican Representative Fred Upton, chairman of the Energy and
Commerce Committee, and U.S. Republican Representative Cliff
Stearns, who is leading the probe, said in a letter to Chu.

It’s the latest twist in the Republicans’ year-long probe
into Solyndra, which filed for bankruptcy in September 2011
despite receiving a $535 million government loan guarantee.

The California company’s failure has been an embarrassment
for the White House after President Barack Obama visited the
firm in 2010. His administration has promoted clean energy as
one way to create jobs.

Republicans have used the failed investment in stump
speeches and television attack ads to criticize Obama’s energy
and economic policies. In their investigation, lawmakers have
tried to show that the government should have cut its losses
earlier in the project.

The Energy Department denied that a $1.4 billion loan
guarantee given to Project Amp was tied to Solyndra.

“As has consistently been the case in the course of this
committee’s year-long political investigation, critics of our
effort to support innovative, job-creating clean energy projects
will say anything to distort the record,” said Damien LaVera,
an Energy Department spokesman.

SOLYNDRA BID TO SUPPLY PANELS

Project Amp is the largest project of its kind in the
country, an effort to generate power for the grid from the roofs
of warehouses in 28 states.

The buildings are managed by real estate company Prologis
, and the project received financial backing from power
company NRG Energy Inc and Bank of America Merrill Lynch
.

Representatives for Prologis and NRG did not immediately
respond to requests for comment, and Bank of America declined
comment.

Solyndra bid to supply panels to an early phase of the
project. The lawmakers said they have documents that show Energy
Department officials were involved in Solyndra’s negotiations
with Prologis for supplying panels in the weeks leading up to
Solyndra’s bankruptcy.

The lawmakers are “greatly concerned at the extraordinary
measures the Obama administration appears to have taken in
keeping Solyndra afloat,” the committee said .

The deal was seen as critical to Solyndra achieving its
sales targets. Private backers of Solyndra said in e-mails they
would only invest more money in the flailing company if the
sales contract was finalized, according to the Republicans.

Other documents show Solyndra employees taking an active
interest in whether Project Amp would obtain a loan guarantee,
the committee said.

Chu was actively involved in propelling Project Amp forward.
But a department spokesman said Chu took interest because of the
scope and importance of the rooftop solar project.

“Secretary Chu strongly supported Project Amp because it
will be the largest rooftop project in U.S. history and is
expected to generate enough clean, renewable electricity to
power over 88,000 homes while supporting at least 1,000 jobs,”
department spokesman LaVera said.

Ultimately, Solyndra shut its doors a month before the
Energy Department finalized the loan guarantee for Project Amp.

The Energy Department’s inspector general – an internal but
independent watchdog – has been investigating Solyndra in tandem
with the FBI, which raided the company in September.

BITTER BATTLE TO CONTINUE

The Republicans initially focused their investigation on
whether the government favored Solyndra because one of its
private investors also raised money for Obama’s 2008
presidential campaign.

But in recent months, the focus has turned to the intricate
details of how and why Solyndra failed. Lawmakers have asked a
government procurement agency for details about Solyndra’s
efforts to secure government contracts.

The Republicans have waged a public fight with the White
House, complaining that the Obama administration has not fully
responded to its requests. The White House has argued it’s all
just to score political points.

“After 187,000 pages of documents, nine committee staff
briefings, and five congressional hearings, Republicans’
allegation of unresponsiveness is as unfounded as their
allegation of political favoritism,” White House spokesman Eric
Schultz said earlier this week.

© 2011 REUTERS (www.reuters.com)
Feb 21, 2012 Posted in Business by GeoUlrich

Hartford Board Acts on Cue

Fund Scope | Scoreboard

The Hartford Financial Services Group made headlines last week as hedge-fund manager and now-activist investor John Paulson, the Hartford’s biggest shareholder, declared that the company should break itself into two entities, property-casualty and life insurance.

No mention was made of the Hartford’s (ticker: HIG) asset-management business, which much more quietly got a vote of no-confidence from its board of directors at virtually the same time.

In what initially appeared to be an unusual decision, the funds’ boards decided that 11 of Hartford’s fixed-income funds were better off subadvised by Boston’s Wellington Management instead of being managed ...

© 2011 Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com)
Feb 21, 2012 Posted in Business by GeoUlrich

Satellite problems cut phones in Canada’s Arctic


Thu Oct 6, 2011 4:41pm EDT

*Flights canceled, bank machines, cell phones stop working

*Service expected to resume quickly

CALGARY, Alberta Oct 6 (Reuters) – A wayward satellite has
cut communications for much of northern Canada, the Canadian
Broadcasting Corp reported on Thursday.

The CBC said on its website that Telesat Canada’s Anik F2
satellite, which provides communications for Canada’s sparsely
populated Arctic, had pointed towards the sun, cutting
long-distance phone service for 39 communities in the Yukon,
Northwest Territories and Nunavut.

The loss of the satellite signal meant most flights in
Nunavut had been canceled, while bank machines and cell phones
in territory’s capital, Iqaluit, a town of 7,250 on Baffin
Island, weren’t working

Telesat Canada said the satellite suffered from a
“technical anomaly” that began early on Thursday morning but
the company had regained control and expected service to soon
return to normal.

The satellite, manufactured by Boeing Corp (BA.N), was put
in service in 2004.
(Reporting by Scott Haggett; editing by Peter Galloway)

© 2011 REUTERS (www.reuters.com)
Feb 20, 2012 Posted in Business by GeoUlrich

Is organic milk worth its higher price?


Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:54pm EST

<span class="articleLocation”>(Reuters) – Organic milk costs more per gallon than premium gasoline, yet it is at the center of a similar debate as to whether organic milk is worth the extra money for the purported benefit it provides.

What is going on with this precious liquid that some people swear by and others dismiss?

Proponents say they will pay the price and seek out milk with the valuable, official “organic” label because it is healthier. Others argue that organic milk is nothing more than a marketing idea to drive up prices and that conventional milk is every bit as nutritious and safe.

Whatever your beliefs on organic milk, the fact is that it costs considerably more than “regular” non-organic milk and is in such short supply that its already-lofty price is rising.

Molly Keveney, spokeswoman for WhiteWave Foods’ Horizon, the leading brand in organic milk, says consumers could typically expect to pay about $4.18 for a half-gallon of organic milk. And a 14-cent increase in the wholesale price is set to take effect on March 1.

The national price for regular unleaded gasoline in the United States rose to $3.58 a gallon in the week through February 13, according to the Energy Information Administration. It had started the year around $3.32 a gallon.

Meanwhile, non-organic milk can be found in certain locations selling for about $2.50 a gallon.

But Isabel Maples, a spokeswoman for the National Dairy Council, contends the difference between the prices is just marketing.

“When I talk to people about organic or not organic, they say they choose organic because they perceive that it’s healthier. From a science point of view – as a dietician and a health professional – I want them to know the facts,” she says.

According to Maples, the fact is conventional milk is both free of any harmful substances and as healthy as organic brands.

WHAT IS ORGANIC?

Organic milk, according to the standards set by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, comes from livestock that must follow these guidelines:

- At least 30 percent of the food they eat must be grazed at pasture during a grazing season of at least 120 days;

- No antibiotics or growth hormones may be used;

- All feed must be organic, and

- No meat or poultry by-products can be in the feed.

The diet of conventional dairy cows is not as fancy as their organic cousins. And they can be treated with antibiotics, although Maples notes that cows being treated must be pulled out of production and any testing that shows signs of antibiotics in the milk requires the entire shipment to be destroyed.

As for growth hormones, while it is still legal in the United States, a small percentage of the country’s dairy cows are being treated with them, according to industry data. Many retailers no longer sell milk from treated cows.

About 4 percent of all dairy sold is organic, according to the most recent industry data.

Phil Lempert, a grocery industry analyst, says the demand for organic milk swelled when consumers began expressing concerns about growth hormones in conventional milk.

Seeing that the market was shifting, the grocery giant Kroger Co announced in 2007 that it would no longer carry milk that contained synthetic growth hormones. (A significant portion of the industrialized world – including Europe, Canada, Japan and Australia, had already banned the substance from their dairy products years earlier.) After that, Lempert says, one U.S. retailer after another followed.

If your concern about milk is synthetic growth hormone, he says you can buy any store brand in the country and get the same nutritional value as organic milk without worrying about those artificial hormones getting mixed in.

DRIVING UP THE PRICE

While organic milk costs more to produce than non-organic milk, that does not account for all of the price difference. Experts say markup varies regionally, but overall, there is a much higher margin on organic milk.

The major contributing factor to the price premium on organic milk is seen as supply versus demand.

When organic dairies drop their certification, it is not easy to replace them. It takes three years to complete the certification to become an organic farm, says Horizon’s Keveney.

An increase in organic feed prices due to bad weather last year had a major impact on supply at a time when demand has continued to rise. Keveney notes there is currently about a 10 percent gap between supply and demand.

Michelle Howard, a consumer who owns a garlic farm and gourmet food business in Massachusetts, was disappointed to find a sign in place of her milk in the dairy case recently that noted a supply shortage. She says she is concerned about growth hormones and antibiotics in the food chain, adding she doesn’t have to worry about that with organic milk.

“The FDA says that rBHG (growth hormone) is ‘safe,’ which it may be,” Howard says. “I don’t necessarily trust the government when it comes to food. … But if you follow the antibiotic trail, you don’t have to be a doctor to figure out this could, and likely does, lead to problems.”

Howard says she would pay up to $5 for a half gallon – a significant premium to conventional milk – and is now paying about $3.50. It is the standards that are important, she says.

“At least with organic there is an accountability system. In addition to being hormone-free, those cows are being fed organic grain. A ‘non-organic’ hormone-free cow can still be fed genetically modified corn. So until there are standards developed around alternative labels such as hormone-free, we’re sticking with organic.”

Whether or not people are willing to shell out any price for organic milk, Lempert, for one, thinks it’s a mistake, to encourage people to pay 25 percent to 60 percent more for organic milk for what he says is no advantage other than the idea of it. He blames a “weak supply chain” caused by a loss of organic farmers, not increased demand for the current shortage of organic milk. The organic industry, he says, is trying to use this current supply issue to draw attention to its products.

“Consumers, particularly in this economy, can’t afford to overpay for something,” Lempert says.

(Editing by Beth Gladstone, Lauren Young, Gary Crosse)

© 2011 REUTERS (www.reuters.com)
Feb 20, 2012 Posted in Business by GeoUlrich

Barron’s 500 Table

Cigarette maker Altria leapt to first place in the 2010 ranking, which is based on cash-flow returns on investment and sales growth. Economically defensive names occupied many top spots this year, while energy, commodities and industrial companies generally fell toward the bottom of the list, a reflection in part of declining raw-materials prices. Some might be good candidates for a stock-market rebound.

Altria GroupGilead SciencesSAICGeneral DynamicsHarrisMedtronicBiogen IdecResearch In MotionMasterCardLiberty Media InteractiveDollar GeneralAmerisourceBergenAONFlowservePhilip Morris Int’lJ.M. SmuckerUniversal American FinancialLaboratory Corp. of AmericaDirecTVRaytheonGameStopColgate-PalmoliveHumanaOracleEli LillyOwens & MinorRogers CommunicationsH.J. HeinzCardinal HealthEverest RePartner ReBank of Nova ScotiaAflacReinsurance Group of AmericaProgressiveSymantecMonsantoRoss StoresMedco Health SolutionsOmnicareHewlett-PackardShaw …

© 2011 Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com)
Feb 20, 2012 Posted in Business by GeoUlrich

Google sued by Apple Safari user

Wilmington, Delaware:  Google officials were sued for violating users’ privacy rights on Apple’s Safari web browser by bypassing computer settings designed to block monitoring of consumers’ online activity.

Google, the world’s biggest internet-search company, has been dodging privacy settings in Safari, which serves as the primary web browser on Apple’s iPhone and iPad products, lawyers for an Illinois man who uses the Safari browser said in a lawsuit filed in federal court in Delaware.

"Google’s willful and knowing actions violated" federal wiretapping laws and other computer-related statutes, attorneys for Matthew Soble said in the complaint.

Google has drawn regulatory scrutiny and pressure from consumer advocates for the way it handles personal information. Last year, it agreed to settle claims with the Federal Trade Commission that Google used deceptive tactics and violated its own privacy policies when it introduced its Buzz social- networking service in 2010.

Article continues below

© 2011 Gulf News (www.gulfnews.com)
Feb 19, 2012 Posted in Business by GeoUlrich

Rent costs ‘increase in January’

The cost of renting a home in England and Wales increased in January, a survey has suggested.

The average rent rose by 0.1% last month from December, to £712 a month, according to LSL Property Services, which owns Your Move and Reeds Rains.

It is the first increase in January that the firm has ever seen.

Rents rose fastest in the West Midlands and South West, with the biggest declines being seen in Wales and the South East.

Rents increased 0.8% in London, with the average monthly rent in the capital now £1,032.

The cheapest average monthly rent was in the North East, at £512.

"The rental market burst back into life unseasonably early in January, with tenants on the move trying to take advantage of what is usually a quieter period for the rental market," said David Newnes, director of LSL Property Services.

"The depth of the underlying demand sustained a higher level of competition for rental property during the Christmas period, preventing more severe falls in rents than we'd normally see during the period."

© 2011 BBC News (www.bbc.co.uk)